Robert Libman: After two tries, will Quebec be prepared for ice storm 3.0?

Article content material

“There is just one factor extra painful than studying from expertise, and that isn’t studying from expertise.” That well-known quote from American poet Archibald MacLeish hit house for thousands and thousands of Quebecers with out electrical energy after final week’s ice storm 2.0.

Article content material

This previous January marked the twenty fifth anniversary of the notorious 1998 ice storm that devastated Quebec, leaving thousands and thousands with out energy for weeks. Shortly after, the Quebec authorities created a seven-member fee headed by engineer Roger Nicolet to delve into the circumstances of the catastrophe, draw classes and make suggestions. The fee travelled the province, holding public hearings and consulting with specialists and different teams.

Article content material

In April of the following 12 months, the fee tabled its complete report, “Pour affronter l’imprévisible” or “Dealing with the Unforeseeable: Classes from the ice storm of ’98”. It was a brick with 500 suggestions, opinions and conclusions.

The suggestions revolved across the implementation of an emergency preparedness coverage and the safety and enchancment of power provide networks, with appreciable evaluation dedicated to the burying of energy traces. In warning concerning the inevitability of more and more unpredictable climate patterns, the fee implored a long-term strategic dedication by all stakeholders to cut back the probabilities of a repeat prevalence.

Article content material

Article content material

Hydro-Québec rebuilt a part of its infrastructure within the wake of the storm and made modifications to shore up the grid in opposition to future disasters. Measures included implementing vegetation management, switching to stronger poles and constructing anti-cascading towers to reduce the probability of a number of towers collapsing in succession.

However as we’ve simply discovered the arduous method, successive governments and Hydro-Québec have fallen brief in guaranteeing implementation of the Nicolet fee’s in depth collection of suggestions and in totally greedy the report’s apt title. As not too long ago as final December, Quebec’s auditor common castigated the utility for its lack of effort in stopping outages, updating getting old infrastructure, clearing vegetation, and extra.

Article content material

Tuesday was Sophie Brochu’s final day as CEO of Hydro-Québec. It’s broadly believed she left due to friction with Power Minister Pierre Fitzgibbon and Premier François Legault, who seemingly need extra management over the alluring potential of the utility’s financial improvement aspect. However Hydro-Québec is before everything accountable to the inhabitants, and its main accountability ought to be the provision and supply of electrical energy to Quebecers. The need of consuming into Hydro’s large earnings to spend money on making the distribution community extra dependable actually involves gentle throughout these disasters.

The Nicolet report known as for an bold “projet de société” for the burying of utility traces. Aerial traces are clearly way more susceptible to climate, notably in densely populated city areas and suburbs with many timber, the place toppling branches could cause havoc, as we simply noticed in Montreal and notably the West Island. Legault has dismissed the answer of burying traces as unrealistic and too costly. However had it been carried out strategically over time in these susceptible areas, 25 years later it could probably have made a serious distinction within the Montreal area.

Article content material

Municipalities have a key preventive position in working with Hydro-Québec to make sure branches and limbs are trimmed close to energy traces, however why aren’t they co-ordinating their endless roadwork with extra subtle plans tied in with burying utility traces?

Hydro crews have been working tirelessly below tough circumstances, and communication has been efficient for probably the most half with spokespeople and on-line data available in each languages. However we shouldn’t have gotten thus far.

Although meteorologists had predicted final week’s flash ice storm, we ended up paying the value as a result of governments and Hydro-Québec didn’t adequately be taught from expertise.

There can be an ice storm 3.0. It’s time for the premier to mud off the report.

Robert Libman is an architect and constructing planning guide who has served as Equality Occasion chief and MNA, as mayor of Côte-St-Luc and as a member of the Montreal government committee. He was a Conservative candidate within the 2015 federal election. twitter.com/robertlibman